quartz/content/notes/zuck.md
2022-10-02 18:46:24 +13:00

1.8 KiB

title aliases tags
zuck
cosc203
asgn3

a friend of yours had a reaction to something so you might be interested in it too.

try to mute angry reactions

algorithms appeal to human nature - amplify things you are interested in - people are interested in things that upset them - it this too impactful - should we make it so there is no algorithm - just let people share what they share and find what they find and just let stuff exist.

  • started this way when there was not technoology to rank stuff
  • when you dont rank stuff the system gets "gamed" in other ways
    • e.g., most recent at the top
    • makes people post a lot
    • miss obviously really important stuff
      • e.g., sibilings getting married etc
        • this would get lots of reactions so this would be ranked higher

could just limit number of posts

  • rank based on quality of posts etc

ability to control the flow of information

  • company run by human beings that have the ability to to decide what is shown and supressed.
  • this concerns a lot of people

"empowering people to express themselves"

  • facebook
    • not imprint their opion - empower people to share
    • bring world closer together
    • huge responsibility
    • choose what gets aplified - what gets supressed
    • help peopple discover what they want
    • value that people can believe different things - good to let them express that
    • knowledge of people utilising facebook for fake pages to promote political agendas
    • coordinated inauthentic behaviour
      • team of people to find and remove these
      • "arms race" 1:40:10
    • "defend integrity of the community" 1:40:30
    • sometimes they get it wrong
    • "do you want more false positive or more false negative" 1:42:01 which do you value more
    • "not black and white"
    • temporary waiting period white visibility is supressed white the story if fact checked.