GitHub/quartz
1
0
Fork 2
mirror of https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz.git synced 2025-12-28 07:14:05 -06:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
4b728bae4e
quartz/content/notes/eth-governance.md
Jet Hughes 826909de0e vault backup: 2022-11-24 13:46:51
2022-11-24 13:46:51 +13:00

3.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

title tags
eth-governance

note: may be out of date after the merge

  • governance are the systems that allow decisions to be made
    • e.g., shareholders vote on proposals for change, elected officials enact legislation that attempts to represent their constituents desires, board of directors have the final say in decision making
  • decentralised governance
    • no one person owns or controls ethereum, this makes traditional organizational governance an incompatible solution
  • eth governance
    • the process by which protocol changes are made
      • not related to how people and applications use the protocol because eth is permissionless – anyone can participate in on chain activities
    • the governance systems need to ensure that changes to the protocol are secure and widely supported by the community
    • on/off chain
      • on: proposed changes to the protocol are decided by stakeholders (holders of a governance token) and voting happens "on the blockchain" – sometimes changes are already written and are automatically implemented if a vote is successful
      • off: decisions are made through an informal process of social discussion, which , if approved, would be implemented in code
    • eth is off chain – but many things built on eth (e.g., DAOs) use on chain governance
  • who is involved (stakeholders)
    • ether holders
    • application users
    • application tooling devs
    • node operators
    • EIP authors – propose changes to the eth protocol
    • miners/validators
    • protocol developers
  • EIP – eth improvement protocol
    • anyone can create
  • process for change
    • propose a core EIP
    • present EIP to devs
      • rejected/modified/considered for dev
    • EIP is developed
    • EIP included in network upgrade (coordination required)
    • upgrade activated (tested on a testnet first)
  • handling diagreements
    • discussion in public forum – hopefully, one side concedes or a medium is reached
    • however can result in a chain split
  • fork: when major technical upgrades or changes need to be made to the network
    • DAO fork
      • low turnout
      • many weren't aware
      • only represented ETH holders, not other participants
    • some didn't want to fork because it wasn't a fault in the system
    • community has adopted a policy of non-intervention in the case of contract bugs or lost funds, to retain credible neutrality

further reading