vault backup: 2022-11-17 11:35:29

content/notes/blockchain-project.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 - [x] what actually is hyperledger fabric? Is it a closed blockchain that different groups can run independently for their own use-case? Or is it one single closed blockchain that many different groups participate in.
 	- hyperledger fabric is one of the projects created by hyperledger. It is a framework/base from which the community can develop their own blockchains.
 - [x] is governance within a closed blockchain the same as within an open blockchain
-	- [ ] 
+	- no of course not. 
 - [ ] why would a participant want to fork?
 - [ ] does the central authority e.g., govt decide who can join and leave?
 - [ ] It the code developed by the central authority or spread across partipants?
@@ -51,8 +51,9 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 - https://medium.com/wavesprotocol/what-closed-blockchain-is-for-190534b5951
 - https://www.investopedia.com/news/public-private-permissioned-blockchains-compared/
 - https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/06/11/public-vs-private-permissioned-ledgers-and-blockchain-standards/?sh=39aaa258550b
+- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-permissioned-blockchains-common-pool-resources-jesus-ruiz/
 
 - https://www.mas.gov.sg/schemes-and-initiatives/project-ubin
-
+- https://alastria.io/en/what-is-alastria/
 
 # Sources

content/notes/governance.md

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Four central parties
 - Token holders
 - Blockchain team
 
+
 ## On chain governance
 users within the chain directly vote on decisions to be made, changes are then made automatically depending on the outcome - this all happens intra-protocol 
 
@@ -33,4 +34,11 @@ some say this method is dangerous [^1] because it uses a one-vote-per-person sys
 
 blockchains are experimental software. they are evolving rapidly. There already exists good models for governing hard technical projects: the Linux Foundation and the IETF. demoracies are not suited for fast, robust, change — they waste a lot of time and effort on campaigns, etc.
 
+## Governance of open vs closed blockchains
+open chains are usually governed using on or off chain governance. 
+
+closed chains completely controlled by the governing authority. they are in charge of development, they have complete control over the blockchain, and decides who can participate.
+
+public permissioned blockchains 
+
 [^1]: https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-should-not-be-democracies-14379e0e23ad

content/notes/think-writing.md

@@ -82,3 +82,4 @@ Permissioned (public) blockchains allow "anyone to join the permissioned network
 
 https://sovrin.org example of a public permissioned blockchain. it is a public service utility enabling self-sovereign identity on the internet. it is based on hyperledger indy. interesting but doesn't really help me.
 
+https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-permissioned-blockchains-common-pool-resources-jesus-ruiz/