From bd40837841a41a51b5597b26ed7b69e79583c77e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jet Hughes Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:35:29 +1300 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2022-11-17 11:35:29 --- content/notes/blockchain-project.md | 5 +++-- content/notes/governance.md | 8 ++++++++ content/notes/think-writing.md | 1 + 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/notes/blockchain-project.md b/content/notes/blockchain-project.md index 18c8916e1..4f24eafd2 100644 --- a/content/notes/blockchain-project.md +++ b/content/notes/blockchain-project.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo - [x] what actually is hyperledger fabric? Is it a closed blockchain that different groups can run independently for their own use-case? Or is it one single closed blockchain that many different groups participate in. - hyperledger fabric is one of the projects created by hyperledger. It is a framework/base from which the community can develop their own blockchains. - [x] is governance within a closed blockchain the same as within an open blockchain - - [ ] + - no of course not. - [ ] why would a participant want to fork? - [ ] does the central authority e.g., govt decide who can join and leave? - [ ] It the code developed by the central authority or spread across partipants? @@ -51,8 +51,9 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo - https://medium.com/wavesprotocol/what-closed-blockchain-is-for-190534b5951 - https://www.investopedia.com/news/public-private-permissioned-blockchains-compared/ - https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/06/11/public-vs-private-permissioned-ledgers-and-blockchain-standards/?sh=39aaa258550b +- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-permissioned-blockchains-common-pool-resources-jesus-ruiz/ - https://www.mas.gov.sg/schemes-and-initiatives/project-ubin - +- https://alastria.io/en/what-is-alastria/ # Sources \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/notes/governance.md b/content/notes/governance.md index d398036fe..64f0ceed6 100644 --- a/content/notes/governance.md +++ b/content/notes/governance.md @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Four central parties - Token holders - Blockchain team + ## On chain governance users within the chain directly vote on decisions to be made, changes are then made automatically depending on the outcome - this all happens intra-protocol @@ -33,4 +34,11 @@ some say this method is dangerous [^1] because it uses a one-vote-per-person sys blockchains are experimental software. they are evolving rapidly. There already exists good models for governing hard technical projects: the Linux Foundation and the IETF. demoracies are not suited for fast, robust, change — they waste a lot of time and effort on campaigns, etc. +## Governance of open vs closed blockchains +open chains are usually governed using on or off chain governance. + +closed chains completely controlled by the governing authority. they are in charge of development, they have complete control over the blockchain, and decides who can participate. + +public permissioned blockchains + [^1]: https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-should-not-be-democracies-14379e0e23ad \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/notes/think-writing.md b/content/notes/think-writing.md index d0e67ae42..3dfbcbd3d 100644 --- a/content/notes/think-writing.md +++ b/content/notes/think-writing.md @@ -82,3 +82,4 @@ Permissioned (public) blockchains allow "anyone to join the permissioned network https://sovrin.org example of a public permissioned blockchain. it is a public service utility enabling self-sovereign identity on the internet. it is based on hyperledger indy. interesting but doesn't really help me. +https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-permissioned-blockchains-common-pool-resources-jesus-ruiz/ \ No newline at end of file