ehrumsey/isuckatcode-pages
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

vault backup: 2025-03-25 11:53:54
All checks were successful
Update pages on webserver / Update (push) Successful in 6s
Details

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
themodernhakr 2025-03-25 11:53:54 -05:00
parent 3282c02bcc
commit a994168436
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
.obsidian/workspace.json vendored
View File

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster Than One.md",
"mode": "source",
"mode": "preview",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
@ -181,9 +181,9 @@
},
"active": "246e3fe4155bbefd",
"lastOpenFiles": [
"Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster Than One.md",
"Minecraft Server Administration/Tips for Minecraft Server Administration.md",
"Minecraft Server Administration/index.md",
"Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster Than One.md",
"Minecraft Datapacking/Arrays",
"Minecraft Datapacking",
"index.md",

1
Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md
View File

@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
---
title: when two macros are faster than one
draft: "false"
published: 2025-03-25
---
While working on my Database datapack (still WIP), I knew I'd want to find the most efficient way to dynamically access dynamically populated arrays. I had some ideas and decided to benchmark them using [Kragast's Benchmark Datapack](https://www.planetminecraft.com/data-pack/benchmark-6443027/). This process was really illuminating to me, and I hope it will be for you as well. Thanks for all the help from **PuckiSilver**, **amandin**, and **Nicoder**.