From 83bb4b114dfdc07514d292443beed0d21d2174dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: themodernhakr Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:36:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2025-03-25 00:36:13 --- Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md b/Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md index d958bf4..e80bbbf 100644 --- a/Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md +++ b/Minecraft Datapacking/When Two Macros are Faster than One.md @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ As expected, the iteration-based function was sloooooow. Both macro functions bl | iteration | 416 | | one_macro | 30342 | | two_macro | 72450 | + The `two_macro` function is *2.4x* faster than the `one_macro` function. What the heck is going on? How does *adding* an entire second macro function *improve* performance??