mirror of
https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz.git
synced 2025-12-27 23:04:05 -06:00
vault backup: 2022-11-24 14:46:51
This commit is contained in:
Jet Hughes
parent
3a243545b4
commit
eef48764e2
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
# Questions
|
||||
[answered-questions](notes/answered-questions.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] It the code developed by the central authority or spread across partipants?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the code developed by the central authority or spread across partipants?
|
||||
- I think the initiating authority is in charge of developing the inital system. (either they do it internally or contract a software company to do it for them)
|
||||
- Maybe they can partner with others to initiate it
|
||||
- It is then maintained by the participants
|
||||
@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
- Maybe:
|
||||
- Maintenance/Development of the codebase
|
||||
- Inviting/banning participants
|
||||
- [ ] Need to consider applications of decentralized identity technology
|
||||
|
||||
# Notes
|
||||
[think-writing/log](notes/think-writing.md)
|
||||
@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
|
||||
# Reading
|
||||
## Blockchain
|
||||
**Read
|
||||
- https://101blockchains.com/blockchain-governance/
|
||||
- https://coopahtroopa.mirror.xyz/_EDyn4cs9tDoOxNGZLfKL7JjLo5rGkkEfRa_a-6VEWw
|
||||
- https://101blockchains.com/permissioned-blockchain/
|
||||
@ -57,7 +59,6 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_by_algorithm
|
||||
- https://medium.com/@Vlad_Zamfir/against-on-chain-governance-a4ceacd040ca
|
||||
- https://medium.com/@FEhrsam/blockchain-governance-programming-our-future-c3bfe30f2d74
|
||||
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102556
|
||||
- https://vitalik.ca/general/2017/12/17/voting.html
|
||||
- https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
|
||||
- https://medium.com/@WayneVaughan/open-vs-closed-blockchains-let-s-end-this-madness-8313e4095ead
|
||||
@ -75,7 +76,18 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
- https://blog.dshr.org/2022/02/ee380-talk.html
|
||||
- https://ethereum.org/669c9e2e2027310b6b3cdce6e1c52962/Ethereum_Whitepaper_-_Buterin_2014.pdf
|
||||
- https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchainasaservice-baas.asp
|
||||
- https://nodes.com/#blockchain-nodes-types
|
||||
|
||||
**Papers
|
||||
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102556 # A novel framework for policy based on-chain governance of blockchain networks
|
||||
- H. M. Kim, H. Turesson, M. Laskowski and A. F. Bahreini, "Permissionless and Permissioned, Technology-Focused and Business Needs-Driven: Understanding the Hybrid Opportunity in Blockchain Through a Case Study of Insolar," in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 776-791, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3003565.
|
||||
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.059 Fork-free hybrid consensus with flexible Proof-of-Activity
|
||||
- Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TII.2019.2941735 zkCrowd: A Hybrid Blockchain-Based Crowdsourcing Platform
|
||||
- https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2920154
|
||||
- DOI:[10.2139/ssrn.2811995](http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811995) Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology
|
||||
- https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709713 # Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?
|
||||
|
||||
**To Read
|
||||
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futarchy
|
||||
- https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/14/externalities/#dshr
|
||||
- https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/network-infrastructures-commons-model-local-participation-governance-and-sustainability
|
||||
@ -84,12 +96,6 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
|
||||
- https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/wikis/display/EBSI/Home
|
||||
- https://time.com/6142810/proof-of-humanity/
|
||||
|
||||
- H. M. Kim, H. Turesson, M. Laskowski and A. F. Bahreini, "Permissionless and Permissioned, Technology-Focused and Business Needs-Driven: Understanding the Hybrid Opportunity in Blockchain Through a Case Study of Insolar," in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 776-791, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3003565.
|
||||
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.059 Fork-free hybrid consensus with flexible Proof-of-Activity
|
||||
- Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TII.2019.2941735 zkCrowd: A Hybrid Blockchain-Based Crowdsourcing Platform
|
||||
- https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2920154
|
||||
- DOI:[10.2139/ssrn.2811995](http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811995) Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology
|
||||
- https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709713 # Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?
|
||||
|
||||
## Other
|
||||
- https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/container-networking/
|
||||
|
||||
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Governance types:
|
||||
- Blockchain (managing the ever changing state of the blockchain's needs nand demands)
|
||||
- Off-chain/On-Chain
|
||||
- off-chain/soft- similar to institutions - a group of individuals trusted by the community form a group which is responsible for the blockchain's governance and well-being
|
||||
- on (self governing) - users within the chin, directly vote on decisions to be made, changes are then made automatically depending on the outcome - this all happens intra-protocol
|
||||
- on (self governing) - users within the chain, directly vote on decisions to be made, changes are then made automatically depending on the outcome - this all happens intra-protocol
|
||||
- Governance of the infrastructure/governance by the infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
# Block chain governance
|
||||
@ -26,13 +26,12 @@ Four central parties
|
||||
- Token holders
|
||||
- Blockchain team
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## On chain governance
|
||||
users within the chain directly vote on decisions to be made, changes are then made automatically depending on the outcome - this all happens intra-protocol
|
||||
|
||||
some say this method is dangerous [^1] because it uses a one-vote-per-person system, and therefore is vulnerable to the [sybil-problem](notes/sybil-problem.md). To counteract this some use a one-vote-per-coin system via [proof-of-stake](proof-of-stake). However this means that people/orgs with more coin have more weight in their votes — this is at best a plutocracy
|
||||
|
||||
blockchains are experimental software. they are evolving rapidly. There already exists good models for governing hard technical projects: the Linux Foundation and the IETF. demoracies are not suited for fast, robust, change — they waste a lot of time and effort on campaigns, etc.
|
||||
blockchains are experimental and are evolving rapidly. There already exists good models for governing hard technical projects: the Linux Foundation and the IETF. demoracies are not suited for fast, robust, change — they waste a lot of time and effort on campaigns, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
## Governance of open vs closed blockchains
|
||||
open chains are usually governed using on or off chain governance.
|
||||
@ -41,4 +40,7 @@ closed chains completely controlled by the governing authority. they are in char
|
||||
|
||||
public permissioned blockchains
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-should-not-be-democracies-14379e0e23ad
|
||||
[^1]: https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-should-not-be-democracies-14379e0e23ad
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
- [eth-governance](notes/eth-governance.md)
|
||||
@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Many enthusiasts simply promote the blockchain as a more efficient, decentralize
|
||||
- [blockchain types and techs table](https://i.imgur.com/NcCoxiU.png)'
|
||||
- rfid tracking
|
||||
- traceability
|
||||
- [flow of products and associated data on the blockchain](https://i.imgur.com/qTuzm4e.png)
|
||||
- 
|
||||
|
||||
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102025 Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the
|
||||
freight logistics industry
|
||||
@ -255,4 +255,5 @@ What do I need to define so that I can design rules for the governance of my blo
|
||||
- Handling Disagreements
|
||||
- Voting protocol
|
||||
|
||||
I just started [this](notes/veracity-governance.md) document. I think I am going too much into detail about the external system.
|
||||
I just started [this](notes/veracity-governance.md) document. I think I am going too much into detail about the external system.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Three main industries
|
||||
- Possibly a representative (or group of reps) from within the org
|
||||
- Small/Family owned
|
||||
- May not be 'tech savvy'
|
||||
- Do they need to run
|
||||
- Can choose to be any type of node.
|
||||
- Food-Manufacturing
|
||||
- Retail/Marketing
|
||||
- + End consumer
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user