From ee68b6dc7e9cb0e14b0fad5063a984278db89b77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Courtland Leer <93223786+courtlandleer@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:45:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] tweak

---
 content/blog/User State is State of the Art.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/content/blog/User State is State of the Art.md b/content/blog/User State is State of the Art.md
index 40cf74c21..797a687b2 100644
--- a/content/blog/User State is State of the Art.md	
+++ b/content/blog/User State is State of the Art.md	
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ The knee jerk reaction to this level of understanding is to assume the problem i
 Besides, surely mapping the full breadth of user identity requires much more compute and storage even than the massive AI hardware buildouts now getting underway. We're drifting into absurd [Borges-like territory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Exactitude_in_Science) imagining maps the size of the land they seek to represent. And didn't [Laplace (eventually) show us](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_demon) that demons like this are hopelessly naive?
 
 ![[escher_honcho.png]]
-*[Escher](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_with_Reflecting_Sphere) gets it...*
+*[Escher](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_with_Reflecting_Sphere) gets it*
+
 ## Matryoshka Representation
 
 So is representing user identity for LLM apps a problem of [computational irreducibility](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_irreducibility)--no shortcuts, full simulation required?