diff --git a/content/notes/Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance.md b/content/notes/Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..060d8fa85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/notes/Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+---
+title: "Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance"
+tags: 
+date:
+authors:
+---
+
+link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284
+
+# Summary
+
+# Extracts
+
+# Notes
+Since 
+
+## Highlights
+- Blockchain technology is not a trustless technology but rather a confidence machine.
+- Blockchain technology increase confidence in the operations of a computational system.
+- Confidence in a blockchain system depends upon its underlying governance structure.
+- The governance of a blockchain system requires trusting a distributed web of actors.
+- Constitutional & polycentric governance theory can help improve blockchain governance.
+# Related
diff --git a/content/notes/think-writing.md b/content/notes/think-writing.md
index 8bc01d814..1d74f8aa7 100644
--- a/content/notes/think-writing.md
+++ b/content/notes/think-writing.md
@@ -125,4 +125,14 @@ Fooken worked.
 
 [[scenarios#Adding a new member]] added some stuff. Idea of having a "lobby" subnetwork where people can apply, and have their documents checked, and where we can vote on them. 
 
-[[scenarios#Proposing Changes/Upgrades to the code or the goverance system]] I think I need to to some reading about the BIP/EIP system. from what I understand they are an off-chain system were someone proposes a change to the protocol, then it is reviewed and accepted, rejected, or modified. I'm not sure who does the voting or how the voting system works for these systems.
\ No newline at end of file
+[[scenarios#Proposing Changes/Upgrades to the code or the goverance system]] I think I need to to some reading about the BIP/EIP system. from what I understand they are an off-chain system were someone proposes a change to the protocol, then it is reviewed and accepted, rejected, or modified. I'm not sure who does the voting or how the voting system works for these systems.
+
+---
+
+# 21/12
+
+Last day In Dunedin.
+
+Need to write some documentation so that when I come back after the break I wont be totally lost. 
+
+[[Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance]]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/content/notes/veracity.md b/content/notes/veracity.md
index e3b0d09ec..5a3d921aa 100644
--- a/content/notes/veracity.md
+++ b/content/notes/veracity.md
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 - [[YAC — BFT Consensus Algorithm for Blockchain]]
 - [[Parallel Governance for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations enabled by Blockchain and Smart Contracts]]
 - [[Vulnerabilities on Hyperledger Fabric]]
+- [[Blockchain as a confidence machine — The problem of trust & challenges of governance]]
 - [[Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda]]
 - [[Now the Code Runs Itself — On-Chain and Off- Chain Governance-of- Blockchain Technologies]]
 - [[Decision Problems in Blockchain Governance — Old Wine in New Bottles or Walking in Someone Elses Shoes]]