vault backup: 2022-12-14 10:11:21

content/notes/An Overview of Forks and Coordination in Blockchain Development.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+title: "An Overview of Forks and Coordination in Blockchain Development"
+tags: 
+date:
+authors:
+---
+
+link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10006
+
+# Summary
+
+# Extracts
+
+# Notes
+
+# Related

content/notes/Parallel Governance for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations enabled by Blockchain and Smart Contracts.md

@@ -8,10 +8,13 @@ authors:
 link: https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540069
 
 # Summary
+Proposes a system of running a _simulated_ blockchain in alongside the real one and using it to test out ideas. Uses the ACP (artificial systems, computational experiments, parallel execution) approach
 
 # Extracts
 ![A parallel governance framework for DAO](https://i.imgur.com/8MU12WW.png)
 
+DAO is a typical complex system with the characteristics of social and engineering complexity. The parallel intelligence theory based on the ACP method provides an effective solution for DAOs parallel governance. As shown in Figure 1, The parallel governance for DAOs is based on parallel DAO systems. Parallel DAO is a combination of Artificial systems, Computational experiments, and Parallel execution (ACP) approach [8]–[10] and the DAO. In a parallel DAO, the artificial systems (A) part is used to model one or more artificial DAO systems corresponding to the real-world DAO systems. Based on the co-evolving real-world and artificial blockchain systems, diversified computational experiments could be designed and conducted in the computational experiments (C) part to evaluate and verify specific behavior, mechanisms, and strategies involved in the DAO systems. The optimal solution will emerge through these experiments and feedback to the real-world DAO systems in the parallel execution (P) part to realize the decision optimization and parallel tuning the DAO systems.
+
 # Notes
 voting mechanisms
 - direct
@@ -26,6 +29,8 @@ voting mechanisms
 
 parallel intelligence theory from ACP approach
 
+case study of GonsisDAO
+
 
 
 # Related

content/notes/think-writing.md

@@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ Implemented a test to remove a node.
 What about forking. do you remove a group of nodes? 
 
 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/415083
-https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10006
 https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08547
 https://scholar.archive.org/work/uf7vmdzi7na5dazrh2jlhvuhr4/access/wayback/https://www.persistent.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/WP-Understanding-Blockchain-Consensus-Models.pdf?pdf=Understanding-Blockchain-Consensus-Models
 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9947249/
@@ -116,3 +115,5 @@ Hyperledger consensus algorithm: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.00554
 
 # 14/12
 
+https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10006
+[[An Overview of Forks and Coordination in Blockchain Development]]

content/notes/veracity.md

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 - [[YAC — BFT Consensus Algorithm for Blockchain]]
 
 **Good**
+- [[Parallel Governance for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations enabled by Blockchain and Smart Contracts]]
 - [[Vulnerabilities on Hyperledger Fabric]]
 - [[Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda]]
 - [[Now the Code Runs Itself — On-Chain and Off- Chain Governance-of- Blockchain Technologies]]