diff --git a/content/notes/Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda.md b/content/notes/Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda.md
index 73320b68a..eeea9b301 100644
--- a/content/notes/Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda.md	
+++ b/content/notes/Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda.md	
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: "Governance in the Blockchain Economy — A Framework and Research Agenda"
 tags: 
-- Accountability
-- Agency-theory
-- Blockchain
-- Decentralized-autonomous-organization
-- Decision rights
-- Distributed-ledger-technology
-- Governance
-- Incentives
-- Smart-contracts
 link: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss10/1
 date:
 authors:
diff --git a/content/notes/think-writing.md b/content/notes/think-writing.md
index e838c9d75..8e8f15f0b 100644
--- a/content/notes/think-writing.md
+++ b/content/notes/think-writing.md
@@ -324,4 +324,19 @@ After: Start from ground up. Work on Implementation
 
 In order to find a base I need to know how a system is governed. This might not be the easiest information to find. I will have to rely on implementation of platform governance using product mechanisms as there are more publicly available. Could I use a combination of different bases. e.g., a DAO for community governance, Ethereum for platform governance, and something else for data. Is that a good way of splitting it up. How can I leverage existing governance of organisations such as the Linux Foundation. 
 
+---
+
+# 29/11
+I have decided to start from a base such as ethereum and adapt it to what I need. By doing this I will either create a solution or gain a much better understanding of the problems which would allow me to create my own solution from the ground up.
+
+Possible starting points
+- swarm.city
+- alastria
+- various DAOs
+- ethereum
+- bitcoin
+
+The governance of a blockchain can be split into four main components: platform, community, apps, data. It is possible that I will choose a different starting point for each component.
+
+How am I going to choose a base? I need to decide on some criteria. What does it need to accomplish? Are there any vendor solutions that are close to what we want.
 
diff --git a/content/notes/veracity-governance.md b/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
index a7bc4b225..684c465a2 100644
--- a/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
+++ b/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
@@ -4,18 +4,6 @@ tags:
 ---
 I just started this to get some basic structure down.
 
-# Aim
-I have decided to start from a base such as ethereum and work to adapt it to what I need. I think by doing this I will either create a solution or gain a much better understanding of the problems which would allow me to create my own solution from the ground up.
-
-Possible starting points
-- swarm.city
-- alastria
-- various DAOs
-- ethereum
-- bitcoin
-
-The governance of a blockchain can be split into four main components [](notes/a%20systematic%20literature%20review%20on%20blockchain%20governance.md)
-
 # Stakeholders
 - Main Authority e.g., govt
 - Other Participants
@@ -38,7 +26,6 @@ Things to consider:
 
 # Process for Change
 Can/Should we use a system similar to EIPs/BIPs?
-- 
 
 # Voting Protocol