Quartz sync: Jul 28, 2024, 10:36 PM

content/Dict/BSD.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+title: BSD - Berkeley Software Distribution
+tags:
+  - glossary
+  - linux
+date: 2024-07-28
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
+draft: false
+---
+[Berkeley Software Distribution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Distribution).
+1. A now-defunct free operating system regarded as the predecessor to modern Linux.
+2. A free software license. In modern use, most commonly refers to the BSD 2-Clause License, aka the FreeBSD license.

content/Dict/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+---
+title: Dict
+tags:
+  - toc
+  - glossary
+date: 2024-07-28
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
+draft: false
+---
+Mostly one-liner definitional files. Some will be longer than others, but if I'm just defining a word/phrase or the tech behind it from a neutral standpoint, it will go in here.

content/Dict/linux-isms.md

@@ -4,18 +4,9 @@ tags:
   - linux
   - glossary
   - misc
-date: 9-08-23
+date: 2023-08-23
 ---
 This article is somewhat of a glossary for all the words/phrases that I use that originate with Linux or related projects like GNU. Many of the terms here can be found in [The Jargon File](http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/). I don't just link to that because it's absolutely massive, but it's a very fun read through if you're interested in how people have talked about computing in the past.
 
 ## On Acronyms
 Unix LOVES their acronyms. `ls`? LiSt. `cat`? conCATenate. `grep`?  Globular Regular Expression Print. Many commands and programs were designed to be typed quickly in the early days of computing, and holdovers persist to this day.
-## Definitions
-### BSD
-- [Berkeley Software Distribution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Distribution).
-	1. A now-defunct free operating system regarded as the predecessor to modern Linux.
-	2. A free software license. Most commonly in modern use, the BSD 2-Clause License, aka the FreeBSD license.
-### Symlink
-- Short for "Symbolic Link." 
-- A file in a Linux system is really just a pointer to a location on a storage device. 
-- A symlink is just a pointer to a pointer [repeat N times] to a location on a storage device.

content/Dict/shell.md

@@ -4,12 +4,10 @@ tags:
   - linux
   - resources
   - misc
+  - glossary
 date: 2024-06-08
-lastmod: 2024-06-08
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
 ---
-> [!info]
-> This is a separate entry to the normal [[Misc/linux-isms|misc Linux page]] because I don't think I can make it concise enough for a few bullet points. 
-
 The UNIX shell is a layer in between you and the operating system kernel (page on that todo!). Through shell programs, you can navigate, edit, and manipulate the files and peripherals on your computer. It's like a portal to what's really happening behind all the graphics.
 
 ## Shell and Shell Accessories

content/Dict/symlink.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+title: Symlink - Symbolic Link
+tags:
+  - glossary
+  - linux
+date: 2024-07-28
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
+draft: false
+---
+- Short for "Symbolic Link." 
+- A file in a Linux system is really just a pointer to a location on a storage device. 
+- A symlink is just a pointer to a pointer \[repeat N times\] to a location on a storage device.

content/Dict/what-is-a-garden.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ title: What is a Garden?
 tags:
   - glossary
   - misc
-date: 9-08-23
+date: 2023-08-23
 ---
 # Definitions
 > A digital garden is an online space at the intersection of a notebook and a blog, where digital gardeners share seeds of thoughts to be cultivated in public.
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ date: 9-08-23
 >
 > \- [Appleton](https://maggieappleton.com/garden-history) (emphasis in original)
 
-These two are the definitions I most commonly subscribe to, as they very closely track the reasons [[why-i-garden|Why I Garden]]. 
+These two are the definitions I most commonly subscribe to, as they very closely track the reasons [[Essays/why-i-garden|Why I Garden]]. 

content/Essays/law-school.md

@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ Law school is a concept that deserves scrutiny, both as an institution and for t
 I don't have a central thesis for this entry, and there isn't really anything profound about the content. I just want to point out what law school does wrong and suggest some alternatives that do or should improve the experience for students.
 
 > [!hint]  Law school as a process *usually* looks like this:
-> Take the [[Misc/lsat|entrance exam]] -> apply  -> first semester -> 1L job offer -> Second semester -> 1L summer job -> 2L job offer -> second year -> 2L summer job -> career offer -> third year -> career.
+> Take the [[Dict/lsat|entrance exam]] -> apply  -> first semester -> 1L job offer -> Second semester -> 1L summer job -> 2L job offer -> second year -> 2L summer job -> career offer -> third year -> career.
 > 
-> Sometimes, the timing of job offers will be delayed, as it depends on the type of employment pursued. I talk about this more in the [[#Job Prospects]] section.
+> Sometimes job offers will be delayed, as it depends on the type of employment pursued. I talk about this more in the [[#Job Prospects]] section.
 ## Applying
 
 I was one of the lucky ones that knew I wanted to be a lawyer right out of the gate. 
 
-With law school, a substantial minority of applicants are on their second career ("nontraditional students"). Quite a few also view law school as a backup plan after job prospects from their recent degree didn't pan out. Teachers and former aspiring history professors are plentiful in this degree. Others will go to law school because it feels like a logical step from their previous degree, rather than out of an actual desire to be an attorney. Unfortunately, the lack of easily accessible or common knowledge about law school harms both of these groups. For those not fully committed to being a lawyer, there is nothing in place to inform prospective students that their attitude would be detrimental to their performance. And for nontraditional students, the system is outright hostile, as it requires considerable time to be carved out of a working adult's day to navigate the steps for starting an application, *on top of* the time spent studying for the [[Misc/lsat|LSAT]] entrance exam.
+With law school, a substantial minority of applicants are on their second career ("nontraditional students"). Quite a few also view law school as a backup plan after job prospects from their recent degree didn't pan out. Teachers and former aspiring history professors are plentiful in this degree. Others will go to law school because it feels like a logical step from their previous degree, rather than out of an actual desire to be an attorney. Unfortunately, the lack of easily accessible or common knowledge about law school harms both of these groups. For those not fully committed to being a lawyer, there is nothing in place to inform prospective students that their attitude would be detrimental to their performance. And for nontraditional students, the system is outright hostile, as it requires considerable time to be carved out of a working adult's day to navigate the steps for starting an application, *on top of* the time spent studying for the [[Dict/lsat|LSAT]] entrance exam.
 
 When looking at the LSAT, it first appears to be a type of aptitude test where you either "have it" or you don't. It's designed to be an indicator of success in law school classes, so this would make sense. Unfortunately, that's not the case. It's absolutely an exam that can be studied for, and one that you can obtain a substantially higher grade from than your first attempt. As such, many different "prep courses" exist which will walk participants through previous question solutions or provide general strategies for question types. **Those who pay for a more expensive prep course will almost always do better than those who do not.** This makes the test hailed as an equalizer really just another secret indicator of financial ability that hampers the fairness of the process.
 

content/Essays/no-ai-fraud-act.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ tags:
   - ai
 date: 2024-01-24
 draft: false
-lastmod: 2024-07-08
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
 ---
 > [!info] **Update**
 > Since publication, GPT-4o was released with controversy over a celebrity voice being potentially appropriated. [[#Detour Her|-> Jump to: Her]]
@@ -149,12 +149,12 @@ Most of the arguments against the Act's Section 230 exception assume that the Ac
 
 And the final nail in the coffin for immunity is precisely that lack of action in the absence of either a partial sword or partial shield. Again looking at YouTube, take a look at their [statement on AI](https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/our-approach-to-responsible-ai-innovation/) from November. <img src="/Attachments/yt-label.png" alt="Screenshot of a YouTube Short's description with a badge reading: 'Altered or synthetic content.' Credit to YouTube." style="float:left;height: 25em; padding: 0em 2em"> 
 
-They claim a label will be applied by creators to AI videos. Yet it's been two months, and no such label appears on very recent videos like [US Presidents SURVIVE An ALIEN ATTACK In GTA 5](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgG7BnXzkAU). Their mentioned dispute tools are also absent, though we have no way of knowing whether those are truly implemented.
+In March 2024, YouTube implemented creator-added Synthetic Content labels as well as  automatic, mandatory labeling for content created with their own AI tools. It can **only** be added on a computer on the web version of YT Studio. Their initially mentioned dispute tools are absent, though we have no way of knowing whether those are implemented.
 
 Now look at Apple, who [*still* has no AI policy for the App Store](https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/). Or Google, whose solution is [user labor](https://techcrunch.com/2023/10/25/google-plays-policy-update-cracks-down-on-offensive-ai-apps-disruptive-notifications/).
 
-The simple truth is that a platform will not enforce any standard if not compelled to. Section 230 was ultimately a net positive because it was a nice carrot to goad platforms into enforcing some ground rules, with a tantalizing shield from liability if they did so. The (rightful) fear then was that if held liable regardless of moderation policy, then platforms would not spend a dime on moderation because if just one post slipped through the lawsuit would hit just as hard. The articles fail to mention this important historical fact when they raise the specter of Section 230, despite the credibility it would lend to their arguments. Yet it does not apply to AI.
-- And in fact, having zero involvement actually enables websites to make an argument (albeit weakly) that they have *no* control over their users' content. Any moderation at all obviously defeats this argument. This underscored the historical need for an incentive, but now that argument is no longer applicable because of the previous sentence. We can guarantee that platforms will comply with the stick.
+The simple truth is that a platform will not properly enforce any standard if not compelled to. Section 230 was ultimately a net positive because it was a nice carrot to goad platforms into enforcing some ground rules, with a tantalizing shield from liability if they did so. The (rightful) fear then was that if held liable regardless of moderation policy, then platforms would not spend a dime on moderation. That is, if even one post slipped through and harmed someone, the lawsuit would hit just as hard regardless of the effort expended to police the platform. The articles fail to mention this important historical fact when they raise the specter of Section 230, despite the credibility it would lend to their points. Yet this historical balance does not apply to AI.
+- More on the incentives pre-Section 230: having zero involvement actually enables websites to make an argument (albeit weakly) that they have *no* control over their users' content and should be absolved of liability. Any moderation at all obviously defeats this argument. This underscored the historical need for an incentive. However, this *still* doesn't apply to AI because we can guarantee that platforms already implement moderation (unless the nightmare outcome of repealing Section 230 happens).
 
 Here, we have platforms that publicly state that they can fight the AI onslaught, but with no motivation behind it. Couple that with investor pressure to stay trendy and it's an environment ripe for stagnation. But we're in no danger of platforms abandoning moderation altogether. So when a carrot is no longer enough, it's time for a stick.
 ### Detour: There is an alternative!
@@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ Notwithstanding the impossibility of a Congressional act canning the First Amend
 >Nothing in this Act shall alter the *application by a court* of First Amendment protections in the event such a defense is asserted to \[a claim of unauthorized performance of a digital depiction\].
 
 (emphasis added). This clause is basically just stating the obvious to try and not get the Act struck down, yet the articles still fail to mention it.
-- Sidebar: Severability clauses like the one in the Act at §§ 3(h) get followed by the Supreme Court when they concern ancillary clauses like this one. If they hate this defense, it doesn't affect anything else in the statute's merit. I'm just hesitant to use this as a legitimate argument because a bad statute will still have an effect in the background while a case percolates.
+- Sidebar: Severability clauses like the one in the Act at § 3(h) tend to be followed by the Supreme Court when they concern ancillary clauses like this one. If they hate this defense, it doesn't affect anything else in the statute's merit. I'm just hesitant to use this as a legitimate argument because a bad statute will still have an effect in the background while a case percolates.
 
-With respect to arguments (not seriously advanced by the articles in issue here) that the statute as a whole is an unconstitutional, note that this is not a legal justification essay. If I was going to evaluate the scrutiny arguments and precedent for whether this specific statute would be constitutional facially or as-applied to specific AI and non-AI examples, I'd submit it as a student note to law journals. I will point out, though, that many other categories of speech are given lesser or no protection just by nature of their effect or content (slander because it harms the subject, non-artistic obscenity, etc). My point is that such a hypothetical challenge would be a close case.
+With respect to arguments (not seriously advanced by the articles in issue here) that the statute as a whole is an unconstitutional, note that this is not a legal justification essay. If I was going to evaluate the scrutiny arguments and precedent for whether this specific statute would be constitutional facially or as-applied to specific AI and non-AI examples, I'd submit it as a student note to law journals. I will point out, though, that many other categories of speech are given lesser or no protection just by nature of their effect or content (slander because it harms the subject, non-artistic obscenity, etc). My point is that such a hypothetical challenge would be a closer case than others in this space have portrayed it.
 
-Finally, if the content of someone's AI-generated image/audio/whatever is truly for a 1st amendment protected purpose, nothing stops them from just...making their criticism/opinion without digital depictions. For example, I don't think there's some expressive meaning to making Biden say "I'm senile" that just stating your opinion yourself wouldn't convey (unlike images on a t-shirt, which were integral to the point that the student was trying to make in [*Guiles v. Marineau*](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/1101375.html) \[[shirt in question](https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Scott_Censorship_AP_crop_img-680x430.jpg)\]). Nonetheless, I think reasonable minds could differ on this point, so feel free to let me know your take.
+Finally, if the content of someone's AI-generated image/audio/whatever is truly for a 1st amendment protected purpose, nothing stops them from just...making their criticism/opinion without digital depictions. For example, I don't think there's some expressive meaning to making Biden say "I'm senile" that just stating your opinion yourself wouldn't convey (unlike images on a t-shirt, which *were* integral to the point that the student was trying to make in [*Guiles v. Marineau*](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/1101375.html) \[[shirt in question](https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Scott_Censorship_AP_crop_img-680x430.jpg)\]). Nonetheless, I think reasonable minds could differ on this point, so feel free to let me know your take.
 ### Detour: Chill, bro
-Since the articles focus so intently on the Act's purported cabining of protected speech directly, they don't address the possibility of a chilling effect on speech. I actually think this point has more merit than the complaints about 1a defenses being limited, or an argument that the whole statute is impermissible because of its restrictions themselves rather than their broader effect. In fact, this point would be where the other arguments about the statute being vague/broad would have the most powerful effect.
+Since the articles focus so intently on the Act's purported cabining of protected speech directly, they don't address the possibility of a **chilling effect** on speech. I actually think this point has more merit than the complaints about 1a defenses being limited, or an argument that the whole statute is impermissible because of its restrictions themselves. In fact, this point would be where the other arguments about the statute being vague/broad would have the most powerful effect.
 ## Conclusion
 Hopefully I've convinced you that there's more to the No AI FRAUD Act than meets the eye. Unlike the Act, I did have to cabin this essay heavily, because the IP nerd in me wants to revive my old RA position and just dive right back into the literature on rights of publicity, privacy, and appropriation. If I did that, I'd end up with a second essay on [[Essays/ai-infringement|AI infringement of IP rights (coming soon)]] and nobody wants that, haha. I definitely have more to say on Section 230, but outright analyses of that statute are kind of stale. If I find something else that it dovetails with, I'll explore it and devote too much of that future essay to it as usual.
 

content/Essays/plagiarism.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The legal field is even more source-mandatory due to the system of precedent, th
 
 As mentioned above, there's definitely a gap in my knowlege/views that broadens the more creative or traditionally-considered-artistic the subject matter gets. Copyright absolutely extends to the arts, but what place does attribution have when the purpose is to entertain? One can hardly document one's creative experience when working on a novel, a script, a painting, in the same way a legal brief can be. I do believe in the necessity of personal attribution for those who directly contributed to an artistic work (think the credits section of a movie) for professional reasons, but beyond that, I'm uncertain.
 ## Digital Gardening and Plagiarism
-For digital gardening in particular, attribution is integral to the concept. [[Misc/what-is-a-garden|A digital garden]] is a network, and the culture of the digital garden is to provide paths out of the current webpage to others on the same site or even to other websites. These associations between webpages make up a comprehensive experience that differs from modern web use (Google search, click, close the tab) and looks more like Wikipedia spelunking. 
+For digital gardening in particular, attribution is integral to the concept. [[Dict/what-is-a-garden|A digital garden]] is a network, and the culture of the digital garden is to provide paths out of the current webpage to others on the same site or even to other websites. These associations between webpages make up a comprehensive experience that differs from modern web use (Google search, click, close the tab) and looks more like Wikipedia spelunking. 
 
 Thus, the true value of attribution in a digital garden is mostly in the link itself rather than the substance of the current page or the linked page. This does not discount the importance of linking to those resources, though.
 

content/Misc/home.md

@@ -4,12 +4,9 @@ tags:
   - toc
   - misc
 date: 2023-08-23
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
 ---
 Things which I didn't really have a category for.
-
-## Definitions/glossaries
--  [[linux-isms|Linux-isms]]: A glossary of the linux terms I've used.
-- [[what-is-a-garden|What is a Garden?]]: The definitions of "digital garden" that I like most.
-- [[lsat|LSAT]]
-## Others
 - [[keys|Key Layouts]]: Sometimes, a good solution starts as a technical necessity.
+- [[Misc/legal-names|Legal Names]]: A collection of silly names for things, law and tech puns.
+- [[Misc/disclaimers|Disclaimers]]: Terms of Use of the site, how I go about writing and editing on this site.

content/Programs I Like/code-editors.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Of course, it's not a perfect solution. I've found another text editor much more
 ## Neovim
 Sometimes, the [[Misc/keys|most efficient solution]] only arises because it was technically necessary, yet when advancements make it no longer necessary, the initial route proves subpar. you just want to bang out a few lines of code, hit save, and go back to whatever you were doing before. This is [Neovim](https://neovim.io/).
 
-Based on the older `vim` text editor (which was in turn based on `vi`, the [[linux-isms#BSD|BSD]] Unix program), Neovim is designed to be as minimally intrusive as possible while remaining responsive to the needs of a developer. 
+Based on the older `vim` text editor (which was in turn based on `vi`, the [[Dict/BSD|BSD]] Unix program), Neovim is designed to be as minimally intrusive as possible while remaining responsive to the needs of a developer. 
 
 This does come with a high learning curve, as Neovim is a *modal text editor*. `vi` was created in the days that a computer was simply a circuit board, a keyboard, and a CRT monitor; no fancy peripherals like a "mouse" or a "touch screen". As such, it needed to be usable in such a non-user-friendly environment. 
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Neovim has three commonly used modes (among others):
 - *Insert mode*: This one is most familiar to those that use Notepad on Windows, or any of the similar Linux/Mac programs. It's just a normal text editor, type letters/numbers/punctuation and navigate with the arrow keys.
 - *Visual mode*: For selecting blocks of text and doing things with a selected block like cutting it to paste somewhere else.
 
-In Normal mode, you can tell Neovim what to do by giving it commands. By default, you start a command with the colon. I shouldn't tell you this, but typing `:q` from Normal mode and pressing Enter will exit the program, because `q` is the Quit command. [[Misc/linux-isms#On Acronyms|Unix loves their acronyms]].
+In Normal mode, you can tell Neovim what to do by giving it commands. By default, you start a command with the colon. I shouldn't tell you this, but typing `:q` from Normal mode and pressing Enter will exit the program, because `q` is the Quit command. [[Dict/linux-isms#On Acronyms|Unix loves their acronyms]].
 
 I'm a believer in the principle that your computer should adapt to you, so I often find myself writing tiny little files around [[Projects/my-computer|my computer]] that I don't want to open VSCode to edit. I just open a terminal (if I'm not already working in one), pull up the path, type the file name, make my changes, and done. It's quick, it's easy, and (my favorite) it's free.
 - To speed the process of opening a terminal, I recommend a dropdown terminal (also called a "quake-style" terminal). The aim is that when you press a keyboard shortcut (Alt+backtick for me), it opens a terminal. I've used both [Guake](http://guake-project.org/) and a docked [tabby-terminal](https://tabby.sh/) for the same end. Still on the fence over which I like more.

content/Projects/Obsidian/home.md

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ tags:
   - cloud
   - notes
 date: 2023-08-23
+lastmod: 2024-07-28
 ---
 Hoo boy. This project needs its entire own folder structure because of the sheer amount of components I have going.
 
@@ -17,4 +18,4 @@ I think my use is divided into three easily separable parts:
 	- These are accessible from any device that can run an Obsidian client.
 	- I just use it currently on my laptop and phone.
 - [[digital-garden|Digital Garden]]: This website. 
-	- It's secretly just run out of a folder in my ^ LiveSync'ed notes repository that I have [[linux-isms#Symlink|symlinked]] into my laptop's local repository for Quartz. 
+	- It's secretly just run out of a folder in my ^ LiveSync'ed notes repository that I have [[Dict/symlink|symlinked]] into my laptop's local repository for Quartz. 

content/Projects/keyboards.md

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ tags:
   - difficulty-easy
   - seedling
 draft: true
-date: 9-08-23
+date: 2024-07-25
+lastmod: 2024-07-25
 ---
 ## The Problem
 

content/Projects/my-computer.md

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Upgrades are inevitable with any piece of hardware. Now that my GPU is up to a 3
 ## Software
 Any software that's actually of note can be found in [[Programs I Like/home|Programs I Like]]. Here, I'll just go over some tenets I've noticed when dealing with my computer as a tool for my work, my projects, and my personal life.
 
-I value low-[[Misc/resistance|resistance]], low-[[Misc/friction|friction]] software. It's what led me to pursue linux, Obsidian, and this website in general. If something is fast to use, I'll use it more often.
+I value low-[[Dict/resistance|resistance]], low-[[Dict/friction|friction]] software. It's what led me to pursue linux, Obsidian, and this website in general. If something is fast to use, I'll use it more often.
 #### Immutable Distros
 Something that's gaining popularity is the immutable operating system, where the underlying filesystem is intentionally resistant to change. I don't see this as overly resistant in my sense, mainly because providers like VanillaOS and Fedora Silverblue recognize that this resistance is present and provide alternative routes to install software. It's more of a compromise.
 

content/Resources/learning-linux.md

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Traditionally, the Linux community is known for being hostile to newcomers. But
 > [!info] Need [[digital-garden#Using this Site|help navigating]] my site?
 
 ## Scope
-I've been daily driving Linux for a combined total of 1.5 years, chronicled [[Essays/on-linux|here]]. I want this entry to serve as a starting point that explains Linux from zero, but I'll try to avoid reinventing the wheel. Many people have written or produced content on . It'll be updated over time. If anything is confusing or if I miss an important topic, please let me know! A [[Misc/what-is-a-garden|digital garden]] is an iterative process.
+I've been daily driving Linux for a combined total of 1.5 years, chronicled [[Essays/on-linux|here]]. I want this entry to serve as a starting point that explains Linux from zero, but I'll try to avoid reinventing the wheel. Many people have written or produced content on . It'll be updated over time. If anything is confusing or if I miss an important topic, please let me know! A [[Dict/what-is-a-garden|digital garden]] is an iterative process.
 ## Basic knowledge
 Linux is designed for someone already familiar with one variant to be able to make certain assumptions about any other Linux system. This is more of a guideline to modern design choices than an actual rule. 
 ### What the operating system is
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Jokes aside, there's a grain of truth in that statement. Linux—the operating s
 
 Many of these are compartmentalized and can only interact with each other in well-defined ways. This document is going to focus on the parts you'll touch the most as an everyday user: primarily userspace 
 
-Linux grew out of a collection of operating system standards called POSIX. Most of those standards pertain to how the system behaves when you interact with it through a [[Misc/shell#The Terminal|terminal]]. But when the open source community got involved with its development, its design had to evolve in a way that could satisfy group "consensus," and could handle many groups developing all its different facets asynchronously.
+Linux grew out of a collection of operating system standards called POSIX. Most of those standards pertain to how the system behaves when you interact with it through a [[Dict/shell#The Terminal|terminal]]. But when the open source community got involved with its development, its design had to evolve in a way that could satisfy group "consensus," and could handle many groups developing all its different facets asynchronously.
 
 ### Installing programs
 

content/Updates/2024/jul.md

@@ -9,9 +9,12 @@ lastmod: 2024-07-31
 ## Housekeeping
 At some point this decade, I'd like to stop living through major historical events, please.
 ## Pages
-- Fixes: [[Essays/no-ai-fraud-act|No AI FRAUD Act]]
+- Fixes, content update: [[Essays/no-ai-fraud-act|No AI FRAUD Act]]
 - New: [[Projects/legal-practice-automation|Automation and the Law]]
 - Content update: [[Essays/plagiarism|Plagiarism]]
 - Precisely **one** main section and **one** subsection left in the AI infringement page before it's ready for edits and publication!
+## Status Updates
+- Migrated some Misc articles to the new folder [Dict](/Dict), where I'll be shoving any one-liner definitional files from now on. Some will be longer than others, but if I'm just defining a word/phrase or the tech behind it from a neutral standpoint, it will go in there.
+- Split formerly Linux-isms into multiple files in Dict.
 ## Helpful Links
-[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[index|Home]]
+[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[Garden/index|Home]]

content/Updates/2024/jun.md

@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ This didn't technically happen in June, but it is why I've been under a rock for
 ## Status Updates
 - I'm using a new section on the updates pages. See below.
 ## Helpful Links
-[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[index|Home]]
+[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[Garden/index|Home]]

content/index.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ date: 2023-08-23
 On my little corner of the internet, I document my adventures in tech and complain about the internet of shit. This is **Projects & Privacy**.
 
 # Welcome!
-You're on a [[Misc/what-is-a-garden|Digital Garden]] dedicated to open-source use and contribution, legal issues in tech, and more.
+You're on a [[Dict/what-is-a-garden|Digital Garden]] dedicated to open-source use and contribution, legal issues in tech, and more.
 
 For a monthly list of what's new on the site, subscribe to the [Updates RSS feed](/Updates.xml).
 ## Important Links

content/templates/Update.md

@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ lastmod: <% tp.date.now("yyyy-MM-DD") %>
 ## Status Updates
 - 
 ## Helpful Links
-[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[index|Home]]
+[[todo-list|Site To-Do List]] | [[Garden/index|Home]]

content/templates/dict-item.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+title: name
+tags:
+  - glossary
+date: <% tp.date.now("yyyy-MM-DD") %>
+lastmod: <% tp.date.now("yyyy-MM-DD") %>
+draft: false
+---