GitHub/quartz
1
0
Fork 2
mirror of https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz.git synced 2026-03-24 15:05:42 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

vault backup: 2022-12-21 14:37:31

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jet Hughes 2022-12-21 14:37:31 +13:00
parent 59e9115e7f
commit 8973364654
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/notes/scenarios.md
View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ What if all of the nodes in the main network are validators? lobby > validators.
Do we want to limit the number of people who can join the chain. maybe a participant from the lobby is selected periodically, and then voted on. Maybe a set of participants are selected and voted on. What would this achieve? this would limit the number of application so that the system does not overload. prevents a person from effectively doing a DoS attack on the application process to prevent ligitamate people from applying. A DoS on the application process might also affect the usual activities of the network. Actually this wouldn't prevent a DoS on the application system. How can we stop a bad actor from sending in many applications? There could be some automatic sreening process which filters out applications that are not valid.
Need to look at risks
Need to look at risks. related considerations within ID space.
# Remove Member
What happens if one participant turned bad and the other wanted to remove them from the group. Ssay we havea grup of 10 participants in a closed blockchain system using a CFT consensus algorithm Then they can be voted out so that their vote is desregarded and so they cant view or access data on the chain. what if they require access to decuments stored on-chain which they dont have local copies of. I guess they wuld have access to a stored copy of the blockchain on their node. But then would this chain be considered valid by oters. they dont store the actual document on the blockchain – only a timestamped hash to prove they had that doc at this particular time. participats should keep local copies of documents. Can participants kick out the initiating authority? You would have some mechanism to ensure that they cant be kicked out. firstly there would have to be a vote to kick them out. unless they aren't actually needed. who are the people that look at the documents that are stored on the chain to check them. Some third party collectively employed by the group? the govt? maybe its required for each participant to sometimes go and check if other participants are being truthful.