vault backup: 2022-11-24 13:46:51

content/notes/blockchain-project.md

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 - [transaction-finality](transaction-finality.md)
 - [consensus](notes/consensus.md)
 - [CPR-governance](notes/CPR-governance.md)
+- [eth-governance](notes/eth-governance.md)
 
 # Reading
 ## Blockchain

content/notes/eth-governance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+title: "eth-governance"
+tags: 
+---
+
+note: may be out of date after the merge
+
+- governance are the systems that allow decisions to be made
+	- e.g., shareholders vote on proposals for change, elected officials enact legislation that attempts to represent their constituents desires, board of directors have the final say in decision making
+- decentralised governance
+	- no one person owns or controls ethereum, this makes traditional organizational governance an incompatible solution
+- eth governance
+	- the process by which protocol changes are made
+		- not related to how people and applications use the protocol because eth is permissionless – anyone can participate in on chain activities
+	- the governance systems need to ensure that changes to the protocol are secure and widely supported by the community
+	- on/off chain
+		- on: proposed changes to the protocol are decided by stakeholders (holders of a governance token) and voting happens "on the blockchain" – sometimes changes are already written and are automatically implemented if a vote is successful
+		- off: decisions are made through an informal process of social discussion, which , if approved, would be implemented in code
+	- eth is off chain – but many things built on eth (e.g., DAOs) use on chain governance
+- who is involved (stakeholders)
+	- ether holders
+	- application users
+	- application tooling devs
+	- node operators
+	- EIP authors – propose changes to the eth protocol
+	- miners/validators
+	- protocol developers
+- EIP – eth improvement protocol
+	- anyone can create
+- process for change
+	- propose a core EIP
+	- present EIP to devs
+		- rejected/modified/considered for dev
+	- EIP is developed
+	- EIP included in network upgrade (coordination required)
+	- upgrade activated (tested on a testnet first)
+- handling diagreements
+	- discussion in public forum – hopefully, one side concedes or a medium is reached
+	- however can result in a chain split
+- fork: when major technical upgrades or changes need to be made to the network
+	-  DAO fork
+		-  low turnout
+		-  many weren't aware
+		-  only represented ETH holders, not other participants
+	-  some didn't want to fork because it wasn't a fault in the system
+	-  community has adopted a policy of non-intervention in the case of contract bugs or lost funds, to retain credible neutrality
+	-  
+
+further reading
+-   [Notes on Blockchain Governance](https://vitalik.ca/general/2017/12/17/voting.html) - _Vitalik Buterin_
+-   [Governance on Ethereum](https://docs.ethhub.io/ethereum-basics/governance/) – _ETHHub_
+-   [How does Ethereum Governance work?](https://cryptotesters.com/blog/ethereum-governance) – _Cryptotesters_
+-   [How Ethereum governance works](https://medium.com/coinmonks/how-ethereum-governance-works-71856426b63a) – _Micah Zoltu_
+-   [What is an Ethereum core developer?](https://hudsonjameson.com/2020-06-22-what-is-an-ethereum-core-developer/) - _Hudson Jameson_
+-   [Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad](https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/03/28/plutocracy.html) - _Vitalik Buterin_
+-   [Moving beyond coin voting governance](https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/08/16/voting3.html) - _Vitalik Buterin_

content/notes/think-writing.md

@@ -245,33 +245,7 @@ Couldn't figure out swipl kernel. Reinstalling virtualbox, and trying to get VM
 In the meantime. I'm going to try to find some example of "governance rules".
 
 starting with https://ethereum.org/en/governance/. Maybe I should aim to produce a similar documet for a proposed veracity blockchain?
-- governance are the systems that allow decisions to be made
-	- e.g., shareholders vote on proposals for change, elected officials enact legislation that attempts to represent their constituents desires, board of directors have the final say in decision making
-- decentralised governance
-	- no one person owns or controls ethereum, this makes traditional organizational governance an incompatible solution
-- eth governance
-	- the process by which protocol changes are made
-		- not related to how people and applications use the protocol because eth is permissionless – anyone can participate in on chain activities
-	- the governance systems need to ensure that changes to the protocol are secure and widely supported by the community
-	- on/off chain
-		- on: proposed changes to the protocol are decided by stakeholders (holders of a governance token) and voting happens "on the blockchain" – sometimes changes are already written and are automatically implemented if a vote is successful
-		- off: decisions are made through an informal process of social discussion, which , if approved, would be implemented in code
-	- eth is off chain – but many things built on eth (e.g., DAOs) use on chain governance
-- who is involved (stakeholders)
-	- ether holders
-	- application users
-	- application tooling devs
-	- node operators
-	- EIP authors – propose changes to the eth protocol
-	- miners/validators
-	- protocol developers
-- EIP – eth improvement protocol
-	- anyone can create
-- process for change
-	- propose a core EIP
-	- present EIP to devs
-		- rejected/modified/considered for dev
-	- EIP is developed
-	- EIP included in network upgrade (coordination required)
-	- upgrade activated (tested on a testnet first)
-- 
+- [eth-governance](notes/eth-governance.md)
+
+What do I need to define so that I can design rules for the governance of my blockchain?
+- How much can I adapt from existing chains? I should probably review the governance of other chains (while developing my own)