GitHub/quartz
1
0
Fork 2
mirror of https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz.git synced 2026-03-24 23:15:46 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Pull-Request [ariasae-12-12-2023] from Obsidian (#46)

Browse Source 
* PUSH NOTE : SSD NVMe Comparison.md

* PUSH NOTE : Emmet Cheat Sheet.md

* PUSH NOTE : Aurora Borealis Sighting.md
This commit is contained in:
Miguel Pimentel 2023-12-12 19:42:43 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8ae5ba3eac
commit 5d110c92f7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 36 additions and 39 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
content/Aurora Borealis Sighting.md
View File

@ -3,15 +3,14 @@ title: Aurora Borealis Sighting
description: Wednesday, July 12th, 2023, was supposed to feature high solar activity, allowing for an incredibly large area of the northern United States to witness the Auroras as long as the light pollution was low. Unfortunately, this forecast did not come to pass. The solar activity remained within normal levels, meaning only Alaska and a few other places were able to see them. Thus cancelling these plans. But I liked the idea of presenting things like this in an Archive format.
date: 2023-07-12
compartir: true
updated: 2023-09-20
category: Archive
updated: 2023-12-12
tags:
- archived
---
> Wednesday, July 12th, 2023, was supposed to feature high solar activity, allowing for an incredibly large area of the northern United States to witness the Auroras as long as the light pollution was low.
>
>
> Unfortunately, this forecast did not come to pass. The solar activity remained within normal levels, meaning only Alaska and a few other places were able to see them. Thus cancelling these plans. But I liked the idea of presenting things like this in an Archive format.
## Light Pollution Table
@ -39,10 +38,10 @@ Viewing the aurora depends on four important factors.
If the geomagnetic field is active, then the aurora will be brighter and further from the poles. Geomagnetic activity is driven by solar activity and solar coronal holes and thus it waxes and wanes with time. The level of geomagnetic activity is indicated by the planetary K index or Kp. The Kp index ranges from 0 to 9.
* For Kp in the range 0 to 2, the aurora will be far north, quite dim in intensity, and not very active.
* For Kp in the range of 3 to 5, the aurora will move further from the poles, it will become brighter and there will be more auroral activity (motion and formations). If you are in the right place, these aurora can be quite pleasing to look at.
* For Kp in the range 6 to 7, the aurora will move even further from the poles and will become quite bright and active. At this geomagnetic activity level, it might be possible to see the aurora from the northern edge of the United States.
* For Kp in the range 8 to 9, the aurora will move even further towards the equator and it will become very bright and very active. These are the events that create the best aurora and the extended auroral oval will be observable by the most people. At these levels, aurora may be seen directly overhead from the northern states of the USA.
- For Kp in the range 0 to 2, the aurora will be far north, quite dim in intensity, and not very active.
- For Kp in the range of 3 to 5, the aurora will move further from the poles, it will become brighter and there will be more auroral activity (motion and formations). If you are in the right place, these aurora can be quite pleasing to look at.
- For Kp in the range 6 to 7, the aurora will move even further from the poles and will become quite bright and active. At this geomagnetic activity level, it might be possible to see the aurora from the northern edge of the United States.
- For Kp in the range 8 to 9, the aurora will move even further towards the equator and it will become very bright and very active. These are the events that create the best aurora and the extended auroral oval will be observable by the most people. At these levels, aurora may be seen directly overhead from the northern states of the USA.
It should be noted that the relationship between Kp and auroral latitude are approximate and represent averages. There will be times when these relationships do not hold up exactly.
@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ Kp is Planetary K Index (0–9)
## Additional Resources
* [Aurora Forecast](https://www.gi.alaska.edu/monitors/aurora-forecast)
* [Aurora Dashboard](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-dashboard-experimental)
* [Space Weather Phenomena](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena)
* [Dive Deeper Into the Science of the Aurora](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-tutorial)
- [Aurora Forecast](https://www.gi.alaska.edu/monitors/aurora-forecast)
- [Aurora Dashboard](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-dashboard-experimental)
- [Space Weather Phenomena](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena)
- [Dive Deeper Into the Science of the Aurora](https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/aurora-tutorial)

11
content/Emmet Cheat Sheet.md
View File

@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
---
title: Emmet Cheat Sheet
updated: 2023-10-19
category: Archive
updated: 2023-12-12
tags:
- archived
compartir: true
---
* [Documentation](https://docs.emmet.io/)
* [Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/emmet) for Emmet in VS Code
- [Documentation](https://docs.emmet.io/)
- [Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/emmet) for Emmet in VS Code
## Notes on Abbreviation Formatting
@ -17,8 +16,8 @@ When you get familiar with Emmet's abbreviations syntax, you may want to use som
This is why Emmet needs some indicators (like spaces) where it should stop parsing to not expand anything that you don't need. If you're still thinking that such formatting is required for complex abbreviations to make them more readable:
* Abbreviations are not a template language, they don't have to be "readable", they have to be "quickly expandable and removable".
* You don't really need to write complex abbreviations. Stop thinking that "typing" is the slowest process in web-development. You'll quickly find out that constructing a single complex abbreviation is much slower and error-prone than constructing and typing a few short ones.
- Abbreviations are not a template language, they don't have to be "readable", they have to be "quickly expandable and removable".
- You don't really need to write complex abbreviations. Stop thinking that "typing" is the slowest process in web-development. You'll quickly find out that constructing a single complex abbreviation is much slower and error-prone than constructing and typing a few short ones.
## HTML + CSS Emmet Short Guide

43
content/SSD NVMe Comparison.md
View File

@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
title: SSD / NVMe Comparison
description: This page was originally published on July 28, 2023 to aid in selecting SSD, NVMe drives to take advantage of an current Micro Center sale.
compartir: true
updated: 2023-10-11
category: Archive
updated: 2023-12-12
tags:
- archived
---
@ -15,23 +14,23 @@ tags:
### 3D NAND
* The most basic of modern SSD technologies. Great for throwing on cheap systems, home servers, anything non-critical really.
* It is not recommended to host your Operating System on 3D NAND, or QLC.
- The most basic of modern SSD technologies. Great for throwing on cheap systems, home servers, anything non-critical really.
- It is not recommended to host your Operating System on 3D NAND, or QLC.
### Quad Level Cell (QLC)
* QLC (Quad Level Cell) is cheaper to manufacture than TLC (Triple Level Cell).
* QLC is much slower and less durable to constant writing than TLC.
* It is not recommended to host your Operating System on 3D NAND, or QLC.
- QLC (Quad Level Cell) is cheaper to manufacture than TLC (Triple Level Cell).
- QLC is much slower and less durable to constant writing than TLC.
- It is not recommended to host your Operating System on 3D NAND, or QLC.
### Triple Level Cell (TLC)
* TLC is more reliable when compared to QLC.
* MLC is a Triple Level Cell based Samsung technology.
- TLC is more reliable when compared to QLC.
- MLC is a Triple Level Cell based Samsung technology.
### Multi Level Cell (MLC)
* MLC is a Triple Level Cell based Samsung technology.
- MLC is a Triple Level Cell based Samsung technology.
Let's break it down:
@ -45,23 +44,23 @@ Let's break it down:
### Storage
* 1 point per GB
* Less accurate the bigger the SSD
* 3 TB and higher drives scale exp/log instead of linearly.
- 1 point per GB
- Less accurate the bigger the SSD
- 3 TB and higher drives scale exp/log instead of linearly.
### Price
Based on price per $1.
Selected $0.10 as the baseline after averaging some calculations.
* 1 point for every $0.01 / GB below $0.10
- 1 point for every $0.01 / GB below $0.10
### Technology Coefficient
* 3D NAND Coefficient = 0.5 (Big Penalty)
* QLC Coefficient = 0.75 (Small Penalty)
* TLC Coefficient = 1.0 (No Change)
* MLC V-NAND coefficient = 1.25 (Small Advantage)
- 3D NAND Coefficient = 0.5 (Big Penalty)
- QLC Coefficient = 0.75 (Small Penalty)
- TLC Coefficient = 1.0 (No Change)
- MLC V-NAND coefficient = 1.25 (Small Advantage)
## NVMe M.2 2280 M Key
@ -137,7 +136,7 @@ _Higher is better._
## Conclusions
* Cheap system? Get **any** of these.
* Secondary drive? Get any **QLC** or better.
* OS Drive? Get any **TLC** or better.
* Extra cash? Premium for reliability? Get any **Samsung** from the list.
- Cheap system? Get **any** of these.
- Secondary drive? Get any **QLC** or better.
- OS Drive? Get any **TLC** or better.
- Extra cash? Premium for reliability? Get any **Samsung** from the list.