diff --git a/content/notes/blockchain-project.md b/content/notes/blockchain-project.md
index 8df188972..1c961bacc 100644
--- a/content/notes/blockchain-project.md
+++ b/content/notes/blockchain-project.md
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ Blockchain technology falls into two distinct classes: open (permissionless) blo
 	- Can they be automatically kicked out or is a vote required? 
 	- How can we distinguish between mistakes and intentional deceit?
 		- Maybe a reputation system. This way one mistake is not fatal, and a reputation can be restored over time
+- [ ] Should the central/initiating groups retain higher privileges even after other participants have joined?
 
 # Notes
 [think-writing/log](notes/think-writing.md)
diff --git a/content/notes/veracity-governance.md b/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
index 4977f2400..adde31fb0 100644
--- a/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
+++ b/content/notes/veracity-governance.md
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Indirect: Stakeholders who are affected by but do not interact with the blockcha
 Things to consider:
 - Should small and large business have equal weight in the vote?
 - ~~Will small businesses be able to set up the required infrastructure?~~
-	- What is the required infrastructure — NVM I think they just use a website/app to upload information
+	- What is the required infrastructure — I think they just use a website/app to upload information
 
 # Process for Change
 Can/Should we use a system similar to EIPs/BIPs?