From 09572af90524f77ff0f4ef2a508cf19f5187dc38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jet Hughes Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:54:38 +1300 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2022-11-30 15:54:38 --- content/notes/media.md | 1 - content/notes/think-writing.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/notes/media.md b/content/notes/media.md index 6fc223d25..8ae9722e9 100644 --- a/content/notes/media.md +++ b/content/notes/media.md @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ tags: # Albums Andrew Wasylyk - Fugitive Light And Themes Of Consolation nathan salsburg -maggie nicols # Books - 2022 diff --git a/content/notes/think-writing.md b/content/notes/think-writing.md index 4bdae18ea..c23e260a9 100644 --- a/content/notes/think-writing.md +++ b/content/notes/think-writing.md @@ -368,4 +368,4 @@ Meeting with david - try rolling back to an earlier version - also test the aforementioned scenario using a small network of ~10 participants -I want to think about how some scenarios may play out within an existing closed blockchain. Firstlly, what happens if one participant turned bad and the other wanted to remove them from the group. Ssay we havea grup of 10 participants in a closed blockchain system using a CFT consensus algorithm Then they can be voted out so that their vote is desregarded and so they cant view or access data on the chain. what if they require access to decuments stored on-chain which they dont have local copies of. I guess they wuld have access to a stored copy of the blockchain on their node. But then would this chain be considered valid by oters. they dont store the actual document on the blockchain – only a timestamped hash to prove they had that doc at this particular time. participats should keep local copies of documents. Can participants kick out the initiating authority? You would have some mechanism to ensure that they cant be kicked out. firstly there would have to be a vote to kick them out. unless they aren't actually needed. who are the people that look at the documents to check them. Some third party collectively employed by the group? the govt? maybe its required for each participant to sometimes go and check if other participants are being truthful \ No newline at end of file +I want to think about how some scenarios may play out within an existing closed blockchain. Firstlly, what happens if one participant turned bad and the other wanted to remove them from the group. Ssay we havea grup of 10 participants in a closed blockchain system using a CFT consensus algorithm Then they can be voted out so that their vote is desregarded and so they cant view or access data on the chain. what if they require access to decuments stored on-chain which they dont have local copies of. I guess they wuld have access to a stored copy of the blockchain on their node. But then would this chain be considered valid by oters. they dont store the actual document on the blockchain – only a timestamped hash to prove they had that doc at this particular time. participats should keep local copies of documents. Can participants kick out the initiating authority? You would have some mechanism to ensure that they cant be kicked out. firstly there would have to be a vote to kick them out. unless they aren't actually needed. who are the people that look at the documents to check them. Some third party collectively employed by the group? the govt? maybe its required for each participant to sometimes go and check if other participants are being truthful. \ No newline at end of file